Charleston Redevelopment Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273715681
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Charleston, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8439701802
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Urban, Community Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,047,077
- Expenses
- $1,464,590
- Assets
- $21,487,391
- Liabilities
- $6,902,946
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mr Jonathan Oakman (President)
- Mrs Geona Shaw-Johnson (Vice President)
- F A Johnson II Esq (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- F A Johnson II Esq (Executive Director): $110,418 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To facilitate, develop, and advocate for neighborhood revitalization, affordable housing construction, preservation and economic development in Charleston County.
What it reported doing in 2024
The CRC is a non-profit organization focused on the development and preservation of affordable housing in the Charleston area and helps secure local, state and national funding for long-term housing affordability. The CRC is organized to leverage funding to facilitate, develop, and advocate for neighborhood revitalization, housing construction, preservation and economic development throughout Charleston County. Working in concert with Development Partners and Local Units of Government.(Continued on Schedule O)The CRC operates three (3) Loan Programs, an affordable housing loan program for developers, Common Cause Rehabilitation Loan Program, and provides Consumer Down Payment Assistance Loans designed to remove financial barriers that hinder the development of affordable housing.The CRC operates the Palmetto Community Land Trust, which provides long term affordability to approximately Two Hundred (200) housing units being planned, constructed, or preserved. The Land Trust places land in long-term trust protection to ensure affordability and accessibility for future generations. The Palmetto Community Land Trust (PCLT) is a program of the Charleston Redevelopment Corporation (CRC), a private 501c3 nonprofit corporation governed by an all-volunteer board of directors.- The CRC's approach to affordable homeownership is a community focused effort. Our dedication to the community is highlighted by our board, which maintains 1/3 representation by low to moderate income persons or residents of low-income neighborhoods.- Community control of land is maintained where the Trust retains ownership of the land and conveys ownership of the improvements to an individual via a 99-year long-term renewable ground lease that can be inherited by future generations.- Single family detached and multi-family housing is removed from the speculative market to restrict price appreciation and to maintain long-term affordability, both in ownership and rental housing.- Preserves public and private subsidies by managing price appreciation, retaining community value, and recycling the subsidy, land, and affordable units for future generations. The resale price of PCLT properties is capped by a formula to ensure affordability remains with the property owner.- Allows local control of the community's housing future to build a long-term relationship with homeowners.- Large scale development is possible through joint venture development and public-private partnerships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.4%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $82.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.67; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.4% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.