Charleston Hope

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900903530
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Charleston, SC, USA
Phone
8436080188
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$501,344
Expenses
$530,710
Assets
$265,147
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EMILY KERR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMILY KERR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $84,644 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charleston hope is a nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing access to mental and behavioral health programs in title i schools to enhance student well-being. Founded in 2011, charleston hope partners with school communities to deliver trauma-informed, school-based mental health counseling, social-emotional support, and enrichment programming that strengthens resilience and fosters healthy development. The organization's work is rooted in the belief that every child, regardless of zip code, deserves access to the care and support necessary to navigate life's challenges and thrive academically, socially, and emotionally. Charleston hope's innovative approach places licensed therapists, trained interns, and care coordinators directly within schools and after-school settings, meeting students where they are and reducing barriers to care.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organizational & program descriptioncharleston hope provides school-based mental and behavioral health programs designed to increase access to care for students in high-poverty schools. Through its thrive program, the organization embeds licensed therapists, clinical interns, and care coordinators within partner schools to deliver individual and group counseling, early intervention, and trauma-informed support. Students receive services that strengthen coping skills, improve behavior, and support academic success, while also contributing to safer and more supportive school environments.the organization also operates the step-in program, a preventative, group-based social-emotional learning program for elementary-aged students. Step-in focuses on building confidence, emotional regulation, and healthy peer relationships through structured activities and guided discussions. In addition, charleston hope engages in advocacy efforts to advance trauma-informed practices within local school systems in partnership with community organizations.during the fiscal year, charleston hope continued to expand its programming and deepen its impact across partner schools, increasing the number of students served and the level of mental health support provided within the school setting.charleston hope provides school-based mental and behavioral health programs designed to increase access to care for students in high-poverty schools. Through its thrive program, the organization embeds licensed therapists, clinical interns, and care coordinators within partner schools to deliver individual and group counseling, early intervention, and trauma-informed support. Students receive services that strengthen coping skills, improve behavior, and support academic success, while also contributing to safer and more supportive school environments.the organization also operates the step-in program, a preventative, group-based social-emotional learning program for elementary-aged students. Step-in focuses on building confidence, emotional regulation, and healthy peer relationships through structured activities and guided discussions. In addition, charleston hope engages in advocacy efforts to advance trauma-informed practices within local school systems in partnership with community organizations.during the fiscal year, charleston hope continued to expand its programming and deepen its impact across partner schools, increasing the number of students served and the level of mental health support provided within the school setting.financial narrativecharleston hope experienced a change in revenue during the fiscal year due to the completion of several one-time and multi-year grant awards that supported prior program expansion. As these funding sources concluded, the organization continued to invest in program delivery and growth, particularly within its thrive school-based mental health program.during this period, charleston hope expanded services to additional schools and increased the number of students receiving mental health support, resulting in higher program-related expenses relative to revenue in the current year. The organization intentionally maintained and grew service delivery to meet student needs despite the transition in funding.charleston hope is actively transitioning to a more diversified and sustainable funding model, including increased individual giving, corporate partnerships, and a shared investment model with school partners. This approach is designed to create long-term financial stability while continuing to expand access to critical mental and behavioral health services.the reported change in net income reflects this strategic transition period and the timing of revenue relative to program expansion, rather than a reduction in organizational impact or financial stability.donated office space is not recognized as in-kind revenue or expense on the form 990, as it does not meet the criteria for recognition under applicable IRS guidelines. As

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $433K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.