Charitable Life Endowment Advancing Teen Soccer Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823879209
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
North Palm Beach, FL, USA
Phone
5613392229
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,920
Expenses
$116
Assets
$2,804

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JONATHAN BERKOWITZ (President)

People named in this filing

  • JONATHAN BERKOWITZ (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

(i) operate a comprehensive program for the education, training and development of economically challenged youth soccer players inclusive of national competitive play;(ii) provide counseling and assistance with the identification, pursuit and exposure to domestic and international career development opportunities leading to scholarships to institutions of higher education or recruitment by professional leagues;(iii) conduct fundraising events and receive charitable donations in support of training, program development and in further support of the not-for-profit corporations operations; and(iv) cultivate relationships with media outlets, local and national sponsors, partners, affiliates, community leaders and the local community for the advancement of the youth soccer players and the not-for-profit corporations purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 1

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 96%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.17; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.