Charger Pride Scholarship Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471137140
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Jenks, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9187202000
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,806
- Expenses
- $60,068
- Assets
- $258,019
- Liabilities
- $201,387
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN B GOLLIVER (President)
People named in this filing
- JANET DICKASON (Treasurer)
- SUSAN B GOLLIVER (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Grant scholarships to graduating seniors at Tulsa Memor
What it reported doing in 2025
We grant scholarships to graduating seniors of Tulsa Memorial High School. we awarded $70,000 in scholarships in 2025
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. Some filed totals do not add up and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.3; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.78; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.