Chapman Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 650425069
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3053293044
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,057,665
- Expenses
- $23,754,834
- Assets
- $101,319,118
- Liabilities
- $1,538,071
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
59 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT HANSEL (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT HANSEL (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $460,803 total reported compensation
- HOWARD RUBIN (CHIEF GRANT OFFICER): $242,990 total reported compensation
- J CHRISTOPHER CUNNINGHAM (VP FINANCE (AS OF 01/2025)): $233,306 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide comprehensive programs and services in collaboration with others that empower our residents with dignity and respect to overcome homelessness, and achieve and maintain long-term self-sufficiency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chapman partnership's workforce development programs include pre -employment orientation, paid internships, and apprenticeships leading to living wage jobs in high demand industries in south Florida. Employment specialists help residents with pre-employment skills training through empower you, a formalized workforce orientation and job readiness training program focused on soft skills - behaviors and attitudes that demonstrate reliability, motivation, and ability to be a team player. With the ultimate goal being education, employment and empowerment, the organization fosters innovation through the chapman academy, incorporating comprehensive, age-appropriate wrap-around strategies serving residents ages 5 to 55 including: - the workforce trades program is a post-secondary alternative to college that offers free, intensive training in sustainable trades relevant to the south Florida economy. Upon completion, participants receive nationally recognized certifications and are eligible for living wage salaries through direct employment opportunities. - the young adult career academy (yaca) is an internship program for young adults ages 14 to 24 that combines soft and hard job skills training with paid work experience in employment sectors specific to operating chapman partnership's homeless assistance centers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.1%; rating input score 96; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.27; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 49 of 51 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $20.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $461K · 59 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.8M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 34 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D expense reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D revenue reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.