Chapel Hill High Band Boosters Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562018426
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Phone
9199422199
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,030
Expenses
$39,072
Assets
$95,529

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rebecca DePasquale (President)

People named in this filing

  • Rebecca DePasquale (President)
  • Christopher Pippen (Treasurer)
  • Laura Dorsey (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Non-profit marching band

What it reported doing in 2024

The Chapel Hill High School Band Booster Club supports the CHHS Marching Band throughout the school year. We provide music and drill writing, clinicians to teach the students, shirts and uniform attire, etc. We all provide food and opportunities for the students to develop and make the marching season more enjoyable. We participated in playing at all varsity football games at Chapel Hill High School and also participate in the Cary Christmas Parade in Cary, NC. Additionally, the Boosters pay for students who go to All-District tryouts and other musical enrichment opportunities in the area.At the end of the school year we provide a cookout party and provide awards to recognize the hard work put in by all the students throughout the school year

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 96% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.44; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.