Chaparral Pom Booster Club Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262625708
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Phone
4802720458
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,493
Expenses
$95,288
Assets
$21,749
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHELLE NORTON (PRESIDENT UNTIL 2-2024)
  • WHITNEY CRUTCHLEY (PRESIDENT AS OF 2-2024)

People named in this filing

  • KIERSTEN MURPHY (VP NATIONALS AS OF 1-2024)
  • LORI EPSTEIN (FUNDRAISING DIRECTOR UNTIL 2-2024)
  • MELINDA CONNELL (FUNDRAISING DIRECTOR AS OF 2-2024)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and support the activities of the chaparral high school pom program and its coaches while increasing the level of awareness of the efforts of the chaparral pom program, both within the school and within the community. The booster program raises money and solicit donations of volunteer time to provide resources to the chaparral pom program over and above those provided by scottsdale unified school district. Our program encourages the highest standards of integrity, hard work, teamwork, and fair play within the pom program and classroom.

What it reported doing in 2023

Provide competition choreography, uniforms and costumes and training for school events, national competitions, and game days.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 32.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 53.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.