Chaparral Elementary PTA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330968211
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Ladera Ranch, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9492345349
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,754
- Expenses
- $94,025
- Assets
- $267,135
- Liabilities
- $3,751
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Emily Zirkel (President)
- Erin Spain (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Emily Zirkel (President)
- Erin Spain (Vice President)
- Kristina Mock (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the welfare of the children attending Chaparral Elementary at home, school and in the community. To bring into closer relation the home and the school, that parents and teachers may cooperate intelligently in the education of the children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Last fiscal year, Chaparral Elementary PTA funded many activities and improvements for the school. We funded many family fun activities and assemblies. Family fun activities included events such as a carnival, movie night, and pancake breakfast with grown ups. We also funded the librarian, new books for teachers and the library, along with all new furniture for the library. Lastly, we funded field trips for our students, including the cost of bussing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.5%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.84; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $94K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.