Changing Rein Eaat
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453584753
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Spanaway, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2533183855
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,196
- Expenses
- $82,946
- Assets
- $7,672
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SANDRA BOE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- THOMAS TOUSE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SANDRA BOE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- THOMAS TOUSE (PRESIDENT)
- JACK GILLETTE (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To facilite human-equine partnerships for growth
What it reported doing in 2020
Organization was closed March to July due to COVID. Consequemtly, participation in our programs was reduced to 13 therapeutic riding students and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 23.8%; rating input score 24
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21% of revenue deployed · 23.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.