Change the Air Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880804383
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Freehold, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 8886282282
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $394,319
- Expenses
- $269,543
- Assets
- $400,524
- Liabilities
- $5,541
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL RUBINO (BOARD CHAIR)
- KENDRA SEYMOUR (VICE CHAIR)
- ANDY PACE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Change the air foundation gives every person the knowledge, resources, and support to achieve better health by breathing safe indoor air.
What it reported doing in 2025
Policy & advocacy: change the air foundation supports initiatives to bring about policy reforms concerning mold, water damage, and poor indoor air quality in residential, commercial, and industrial properties at all levels of the u.s. Government. Unfortunately, the removal of mold and water damage is not regulated at the federal level nor in most states. As a result, the person responsible for removing mold and water damage from homes and buildings is unlikely to have any kind of specialized knowledge, training, and certification. As a result, ineffective and unsafe practices are occurring every day. This needs to change. To tackle this problem, change the air foundation advocates at the state and federal level for: public health awareness programs and information about mold, water damage, and poor indoor air quality, through state departments of health; firmer disclosures on mold and water damage for residential, commercial, and industrial real property; certification requirements for mold inspectors and remediators in states that do no have them; and increased funding and appropriations for research.since our inception, change the air foundation has worked alongside a group of dedicated volunteers in 22 states advocating for new laws related to mold, water damage, and poor indoor air quality. In 2024, we led the charge to help create and pass into law Illinois sb 1087, the mold remediation registration act, a groundbreaking law designed to protect people in Illinois from the health risks of mold in water-damaged buildings. In 2024, we funded our first national policy brief, designed to provide a roadmap for policymakers, legislators, and others working at the state and federal levels to address issues related to mold and dampness in our homes and buildings. To date, our advocacy work has resulted in one state bill being passed and 12 state bills being proposed. We have also helped propose one federal amendment to the ndaa that was later passed into law, as well as helped propose one federal bill. In the summer of 2023, brandon chappo, director of public policy, traveled to Washington, d.c. To advocate for the healthy at home act of 2023. This federal bill will provide research, standard-setting accountability, financial support, and education for tenants that will improve the health, safety, and overall habitability of our country's housing. During this time, chappo met with over 30 congressional offices, or just over 5% of congress!
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.6%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.6% of revenue deployed · 72.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $196K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.