Change Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237206742
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6122597384
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Job Training

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$345,812
Expenses
$322,975
Assets
$187,644
Liabilities
$-2,085

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES NELSON (Director): $29,765 total reported compensation
  • RICHARD MAMMEN (Director): $28,421 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Creating occasions and relationships for the inevitability of change, addressing the challenges of racism and poverty through the development of both human capital and community builidng blocks.

What it reported doing in 2017

A. Program: The community school collaborative (CSC) is an in-school and in-community partnership with Guadalupe Alternative Programs (GAP) focusing on 26 schools in the twin cities. Services include targeted outreach, social and emotional skill development, mediation, mentoring, parent engagement, case consultation, care coordination, staff development, Individual/Group/Family therapy.Services are provided year round during days and evenings, Monday - Friday. Roughly 700 children and families are served yearly.Goals: 80% of clients will report satisfaction with services upon termination of therapy. 80% of clients will report their problem as improved as rated by PSSF. 70% of clients will remain in the same placement/setting or move to a less restrictive placement/setting. 70% of clients will maintain or improve their functioning at home, school and in the community. B. Program: The clinic project is an outpatient therapy program. Clinicians are available to treat a variety of mental health concerns. Most major health plans, medical assistance and private pay are accepted as payment for outpatient therapy through the clinic project. Services are provided year round during days and evenings, Monday - Friday. Roughly 50 children and families are served yearly.Goals: Referrals will be contacted within one week of referral of being received. 90% of clients will report satisfaction with services upon termination of therapy. 80% of clients will report their problem as improved as rated by PSSF. C. Program: Mental Health Workforce Development includes supervision and training of mental health behavioral aides, mental health practitioners, and mental health professionals working towards licensure. Change Inc. partners with area graduate schools and with the Department of Human Services to train and supervise clinicians from ethnic and cultural minority communities. Services are provided Monday - Friday during working hours.An estimated 50 Mental Health Behavioral Aides, Practitioners and Professionals are trained and supervised yearly.Goals: Recruit, train and supervise 50 Mental Health Behavioral Aides, Practitioners, and Professionals yearly. Outreach, recruit, retain 15 Mental Health Behavioral Aides, Practitioners and Professionals from Ethnic and Cultural Minority Communities yearly. 90% of supervisees will progress to next Professional level within 2 year's time. 90% of Supervisees will rate supervision as good/excellent on yearly rating scale.D. Program: Change strategies & conversations at the crossroads include organizational and leadership development, consultation, research and training - specializing in multi-organizational collaboration and promoting mutual respect, learning and accountability. The Relational Climate Assessment, A Change Inc. developed tool, is utilized to assist organizations, schools and communities to focus on capacity and effectiveness of relational functioning. Conversations at the Crossroads is a series of events providing 'insider' views and community dialog on issues effecting Minneapolis and St. Paul.Services are provided as contracted.An estimate 3-5 projects are designed, implemented and evaluated yearly. Goals are specific to contracted work plans.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 35
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $293K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.