Chandler Cultural Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742538528
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chandler, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4807822672
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,706,136
- Expenses
- $3,047,302
- Assets
- $8,892,574
- Liabilities
- $1,072,385
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE MAC LENNAN (PRESIDENT)
- TERRI RETTIG (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE MAC LENNAN (PRESIDENT): $181,642 total reported compensation
- TERRI RETTIG (VICE PRESIDENT): $119,961 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to connect communities and inspire people to engage with inclusive and enriching arts experiences.
What it reported doing in 2024
The chandler cultural foundation (ccf) celebrated its 34th season of presenting arts events for the community. Annual events featured a diverse offering of free and paid performances and exhibitions featuring local, regional, national and international artists. The chandler center for the arts (cca) served more than 150,250 patrons with an additional 2,500 households reached through livestreamed events. Ccf maintained a strong commitment to its mission, with program investments and audience development focused on black, hispanic/latino and intergenerational and family programs. Ccf's arts education initiatives continued to inspire creativity and learning for thousands of young people. The connecting kids program reached over 8,500 students. The theatre kids program engaged 4,300 participants, 61% of whom were from title i schools. Visual arts programming, including vision kids and related activities, served 2,566 young people, and the youth arts council celebrated its 13th graduating cohort. The camp kids summer program achieved 93% attendance and awarded 18 scholarships to ensure access. Ccf also launched a new artist-in-residence project with ashli st. Armant to develop an original work, further strengthening its commitment to creative workers and community engagement. In addition to its own programs, the cca served as a vital community hub and cultural gathering place for the region. The chandler center for the arts hosted performances, recitals, and events for more than 50 local arts, cultural, and nonprofit organizations, providing affordable access to a state-of-the-art facility and professional support services. This collaborative environment nurtured local talent, strengthened cultural organizations, and fostered civic engagement by creating inclusive spaces for storytelling, celebration, and community dialogue.volunteers continued to play a vital role in advancing ccf's mission and delivering exceptional arts and cultural experiences. In fy24, 159 volunteers, including members of the friends of cca, board members, and committee participants, contributed more than 8,600 hours of service. Their dedication is valued at over $276,500 according to the corporation for national and community service. This remarkable volunteer commitment not only extends the capacity of ccf's staff but also deepens community ownership and investment in the arts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.4%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.8%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.4% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $182K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.