Chan Soon-shiong Nanthealth Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273651366
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- El Segundo, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3108366400
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Medical Disciplines Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,855
- Expenses
- $743,382
- Assets
- $22,200,728
- Liabilities
- $347,655
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICK SOON-SHIONG (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PHILLIP B GORDON (DIRECTOR OF GOVT. RELATIONS): $331,008 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific and primary purpose of this organization is to engage in the continuous active conduct of medical research in conjunction with one or more hospitals which are described in section 501(c)(3) of the code, are federal hospitals, or are instrumentalities of a governmental unit referred to in section 170(c)(1) of the code. The organization is dedicated to research and technology development in personalized molecular medicine for the treatment of unmet medical needs. Personalized molecular medicine provides customization of healthcare, with decisions and practices being tailored to individual patients at the molecular level.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization is directly engaged in the continuous active conduct of medical research in conjunction with various clinical settings and hospitals. Initially, the organization was engaged in a joint effort with providence saint john's health center to conduct research and development of personalized molecular medical therapies for the treatment of unmet medical needs. Currently, the organization is engaged in joint efforts with windber hospital and johns hopkins university to conduct parallel research and development. The organization provides funding, data and expertise and performs support services including, without limitation, custom engineering, regulatory and medical support services for each project conducted through its joint efforts with windber hospital and johns hopkins university. The organization also plans to conduct medical research projects in collaboration with various universities, particularly research projects led by faculty of the university of California and partner institutions. The organization will annually expend funds equal to 3.5% or more of the fair market value of its endowment for the continuous conduct of medical research or will devote more than one half of its assets to the continuous conduct of medical research. The organization has contracted with chan soon-shiong institute of molecular medicine at windber to study the longer term effects of covid-19 in breast cancer patients. The study involves over 400 participants. Breast cancer is a common cancer in women with 685,000 worldwide deaths in the year 2020 alone. Approximately 30% of all new female cancers are breast cancer. Many of the established risk factors are linked to estrogens. Risk is increased by beginning menstruation at a young age, entering menopause later in life, and obesity in postmenopausal women. The physiological environment that stimulates somatic cells proliferation and differentiation leading to carcinoma are not well understood. The relationship between inflammation and cancer is emerging. Inflammatory diseases increase the risk of developing cancer. Plasma from participants in the study who had covid-19 or not will be utilized to understand the anti-inflammatory immune response in patients with previous breast cancer diagnosis and compare with participants with no previous cancer diagnosis (controls). The hypothesis is that the increased immune response to covid-19 results in a chronic immune response in the breast changing the microenvironment from at th1 response to a th2 response which results in more aggressive breast cancer. The study is ongoing and the findings will be published upon completion.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 60
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,046.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 29.86; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 44.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -30.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -29.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $713K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $331K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.