Champions Building Champions Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273280785
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
South Easton, MA, USA
Phone
5089225499
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Physical Fitness and Community Recreational Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,667
Expenses
$46,518
Assets
$10,307
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN B CONRAD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN B CONRAD (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL MACINTOSH (CLERK)
  • JONATHAN J PIKE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Champions building champions inc. (cbc) is a non-profit corporation focused on teaching the youth of Massachusetts how to lead healthy, active lives while learning to take an active role in defining their community. These lessons are taught through physical activities such as cross fitness training, confidence courses, team building exercises, wrestling, and mixed martial arts, as well as mentoring, life coaching, and community service.

What it reported doing in 2019

The organization developed, marketed, and held a flag football league for approximately 350 youths between the age of 5 and 17. Youths participated in games each week spanning 8 weeks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 68.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.