Champ Cares Charitable Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270974113
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Louisville, KY, USA
- Phone
- 5024258022
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,716
- Expenses
- $41,643
- Assets
- $1,141,814
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRAD HUNT (CHAIR/PRESIDENT)
- WHITNEY PHILPOT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SANDY DEEL (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- GREGORY RUFFONI (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRAD HUNT (CHAIR/PRESIDENT)
- WHITNEY PHILPOT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SANDY DEEL (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The champ cares charitable fund will make grants to employees of thorntons llc and subsidiaries and affiliates and their families who suffer severe financial hardship as a result of a catastrophic event.
What it reported doing in 2025
Grant making to employees and their families suffering severe financial hardship caused by catastrophic events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some related-organization disclosures are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 27.42; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.