Chambersburg Community Police Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920538550
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Chambersburg, PA, USA
Phone
7177291748
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Law Enforcement

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,625
Expenses
$13,603
Assets
$110,386
Liabilities
$9,746

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM T EVERLY JR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WALTER BIETSCH (BOARD MEMBER)
  • TANYA K NITTERHOUSE (BOARD MEMBER)
  • WILLIAM KICK (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The chambersburg community police foundation's purpose is to supplement the essential needs of the chambersburg police department that are not met through the budget of the chambersburg borough police department and the general fund of the borough of chambersburg. The needs of the chambersburg police department may include new equipment, advances in technology, officer training, officer wellness, recruitment, and public safety training.

What it reported doing in 2025

The holiday with heroes event or "shop with a cop". With support from this foundation and volunteer hours from members of the chambersburg police force and foundation board members, food, clothing and household items were provided to underprivileged families in the community in december.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.1%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 66.5%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.11; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 39.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 28.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 57.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.1% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.