Chambersburg Area Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 256063943
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Chambersburg, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172647101
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $799,218
- Expenses
- $478,104
- Assets
- $26,061,396
- Liabilities
- $7,353,031
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD ROSENBERRY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOSH BLANKENSHIP (DIRECTOR)
- BRYAN BURKHOLDER (DIRECTOR)
- ERIC DEARDORFF (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Facilitate economic development in the chambersburg area
What it reported doing in 2025
Purchase, development, and sale of land for industrial development
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 60% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.1%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 53.7%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.2%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 54.51; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.1% of revenue deployed · 53.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $257K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes related organizations
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.