Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadephia

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
230969030
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2157903646
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,439,223
Expenses
$15,208,816
Assets
$21,293,447
Liabilities
$7,514,572

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

41 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROCHELLE CAMERON (PRESIDENT AS OF 07/11/22)
  • CLAIRE GREENWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, VP OF)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROCHELLE CAMERON (PRESIDENT AS OF 07/11/22): $653,972 total reported compensation
  • ANDREA R ALLON (COO): $411,425 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM CARTER (VP, LOCAL GOVT, ADVOCACY &): $255,156 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The chamber of commerce for greater philadelphia (the chamber) brings area businesses and civic leaders together to promote growth and create opportunity in our region. Our members represent eleven counties, three states, and roughly 600,000 employees from thousands of member companies and organizations. By bringing all kinds of businesses and leaders to the table - new, established, big, small, growing, thriving, perennial, innovative, and experimental - we build community and find commonalities among us all. We advocate for regional development, business-friendly public policies, and economic prosperity. We support our members with practical, inspiring programs, resources and events.

What it reported doing in 2024

The economic competitiveness program advanced the chamber's work to attract and expand companies, capital, and talent in the greater philadelphia region. The chamber engaged c-suite leaders from member companies, partners, and investors to amplify the region's competitive advantages and accelerate equitable economic growth. The program prioritized activities in the technology and life sciences sectors, implemented a multi-platform approach to address the region's talent and workforce challenges, and built partnerships and marketing campaigns to ensure companies and talent select greater philadelphia.in fy25, the chamber managed a pipeline of 256 new business attraction, expansion, and retention leads and prospects. The chamber supported 24 companies in making pro-greater philadelphia decisions for new locations (6), expansions (18), or retention projects. Targeted marketing campaigns generated 17.7 million impressions and 29,103 conversions through business and talent attraction digital ads. The chamber's talent attraction campaign (stayforphilly.com), launched in february 2025 in partnership with visit philadelphia, generated 1.57 million impressions, 66,800 site views, and 6,400 job board interactions.the greater philadelphia talent network engaged 18 regional colleges and universities and 20 workforce development organizations, hosting 6 inclusive talent solutions gatherings that reached more than 350 individuals across technology, building trades, energy, business, healthcare, infrastructure, and life sciences industries.the diverse procurement collaborative network connected 72 buyer companies with 40 diverse suppliers, facilitating $82.2 million in regional black and brown spend among network members.the chamber secured 322 positive earned media placements highlighting the region's assets and targeted industries. The chamber published research including "leading the way: cell and gene therapy in greater philadelphia and partnered with campus philly on research regarding college graduate retention and international student contributions to the regional talent pool.the chamber partnered with the pew charitable trusts and regional economic development partners to develop an integrated economic growth and workforce strategy. [note: you may want to add information about the se pa regional prosperity partnership here if that's appropriate for this tax year]these activities advanced the chamber's exempt purpose by attracting new businesses and jobs to the region, supporting business expansion and retention, developing regional talent pipelines, promoting supplier diversity and inclusive economic growth, and enhancing the region's reputation as a competitive location for business investment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 33 of 33 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $654K · 41 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.