Challenge 22 Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931479215
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Winter Garden, FL, USA
Phone
4077019416
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,011
Expenses
$49,457
Assets
$73,464

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KURT GIES (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • AUSTON ARTHER (CHAIR)
  • LANA GIES (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Challenge 22 is a Florida-based non-profit with the mission to end suicide among veterans, first responders, and family members. The mission is achieved by raising funds and awareness and connecting those impacted with game-changing resources.

What it reported doing in 2025

End suicide among veterans, first responders, and family members. Raise funds and awareness and connect those impacted with game- changing resources.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.3%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 59.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -129.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.3% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.