Chabad Relief Project
Legal name: Chabad Relief Project Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451211571
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2019
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- New York, NY, United States
- Phone
- 2122073738
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,002
- Expenses
- $151,670
- Assets
- $8,074
- Liabilities
- $2,196
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Noach Heber (Director, Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Noach Heber (Director, Executive Director)
- Levi Shmotkin (Director)
- Lipa Lieberman (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Chabad Relief Project's mission is to assist needy families and individuals by delivering monthly food packages. The Chabad Relief Project also provides a unique volunteer experience, allowing people of all backgrounds to come together as a community and work for the benefit of those less fortunate. Upcoming Events.
What it reported doing in 2019
Over 1,850 boxes of food were delivered to poor Individuals and households in New York City in 2019, to an estimated 180 households per month.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.5%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 98.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $152K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.