Certification Board for Myofascial Trigger Point Therapy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421670935
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Monongahela, PA, USA
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$407
Expenses
$817
Assets
$16,755

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TANYA CHANEY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TANYA CHANEY (PRESIDENT)
  • STEW WILD (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DEBORAH MORAN (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations mission is to create a professional board of myofascial trigger point therapists and health professionals to administer a voluntary certification program and re-certification process to recognize successful applicants as certifieed myofascial trigger point therapists and to engage in related activities as allowable by law, in order to promote the common interests of myofascial trigger point therapists of promoting professional standards and methods in the profession , establishing and maintaining the integrity of the profession, and providing to the public a means of identifying qualifies myofascial trigger point therapists.

What it reported doing in 2022

The organization maintains its goals and missions by not only cerifying its members but keeping them properly educated and up to date within the field of myofascial trigger point therapy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -100.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.51; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -66.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -46.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $817 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.