Ceo Action for Inclusion and Diversity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994896397
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7035483440
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,271,586
- Expenses
- $569,178
- Assets
- $4,273,158
- Liabilities
- $567,669
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHNNY C TAYLOR JR (President)
- ANURADHA HEBBAR (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHNNY C TAYLOR JR (President): $4,001,668 total reported compensation
- NICHOLAS SCHACHT SHRM-SCP (DIRECTOR): $978,895 total reported compensation
- EMILY M DICKENS JD (Secretary): $918,873 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
I) advance research and thought leadership to support a new approach to understanding and activating inclusion as an important strategic imperative embedded in organizational cultures; (ii) support, promote, and encourage public education regarding the importance of fostering workplace unifying inclusion initiatives; (iii) facilitate collaboration, peer-to-peer learning, development, and provide trusted guidance to help organizational leaders make informed, evidence-based, impactful decisions for their organizations; and (iv) deliver holistic solutions and equip companies with the strategies and tools they need to drive meaningful change and measure their impact in cultivating environments that embrace diversity in its broadest sense, promote fairness in talent systems, and provide everyone access to opportunity, allowing organizations to innovate and thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
Thought leadership: ceo action provides content and thought leadership across a variety of formats and forums to help educate ceos and people executives on innovative people, talent, and culture practices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.1%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.51; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 128.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.1% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $479K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4M · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.