Century Harvest Farms Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823033477
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Greenback, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8659347094
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $701,179
- Expenses
- $993,073
- Assets
- $967,532
- Liabilities
- $154,767
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER MCMAHON (EXECUTIVE DI): $69,278 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to empower, create new jobs, and healthier futures for folks in recovery and who have experienced incarceration.
What it reported doing in 2020
Purpose & description: started in 2018, from the ground up (fgu) is a 14-week workforce development program designed to offer individuals who have experienced incarceration and/or who are in recovery for substance abuse an opportunity to overcome challenges they face in becoming self-sufficient and providing for themselves and their families. Program participants (called makers) accomplish this through 3 primary means see below for more details: 1) life skills education & hands-on training, 2) support services, and 3) full-time employment. We serve residents (ages 18 and up) in an 8-county region in eastern Tennessee, including areas that are rural and urban. Most of fgus activities take place at century harvest farms foundations (chff) 350-acre training facility complete with a farm, commercial kitchen, and food processing center, and store where goods are sold to the public. 1) life skills education & hands-on training: makers complete 312 hours of interactive programming over the course of 39 8-hour days that take place 3 times weekly. Orientation/onboarding are completed on days 1 2. Days 3 20 are spent doing on the farm training like growing/harvesting food, haymaking, bakery, butchery, tractor maintenance, mechanical repairs, etc. Culminating in their selection of a career path in agriculture, culinary, or repair & maintenance. Days 21 30 are reserved for ongoing hands-on training in their career choice; engaging in job readiness (resume writing, mock interviewing, etc.); and learning about basic life skills money management, nutrition and food preparation, and more. Days 31 39, makers begin on-site training at chff or with one of chffs employment partners. 2) support services: during these 14 weeks, we work with each makers case manager to identify specific barriers to training and employment and offer resources to support the individual based on his or her challenges including transportation, childcare, uniforms, equipment necessary to support learning, and access to comprehensive wrap-around health and human services provided by social services partners to support overall wellness in recovery and healthy lifestyles. In 2020, with the covid-19 pandemic, we added safety assistance for our makers enrolled in our fgu program. In 2020, we assisted makers with housing costs, keeping their phones active to keep in contact with their support systems, 3 meals a day (7 days a week), and provided free covid testing for individuals who were exposed. Additionally, makers have access to recovery supports such as narcotics anonymous/alcoholics anonymous and regular interactions with a full-time certified peer recovery specialist. Our social services partners include organizations like the ones below with whom we collaborate to recruit fgu program participants: -- recovery court: special courts willing to handle cases involving substance-abuse offenders through comprehensive supervision, drug testing, treatment services, and immediate sanctions and incentives like workforce development programs. -- community action agencies: nonprofits and public organizations created to combat poverty by delivering a broad range of comprehensive services to create economic impact like job readiness programs. -- intensive outpatient recovery programs: provide holistic, nurturing, and therapeutic environments for families and individuals to achieve sobriety. 3)full-time employment: after graduating from fgu (day 40), makers recommended for employment are placed in a full-time job with continued support services and monitoring provided by their case managers. Our employment business partners include both local and national companies specializing in our 3 career areas of agriculture, culinary, and mechanical & trade who commit to serving as job placement locations for our makers once they graduate from fgu. Examples of these are monterey mushroom, american culinary federation, sysco corporation, and noble auto sales.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 73.7%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -41.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 58.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 73.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $732K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.