Centro Tyrone Guzman
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411290349
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6128741412
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,974,638
- Expenses
- $3,943,870
- Assets
- $2,752,165
- Liabilities
- $376,153
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- XAVIER VAZQUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- XAVIER VAZQUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $129,742 total reported compensation
- ABRAHAM ZHANAY (CONTROLLER): $88,904 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To contribute to the wellbeing of latine families through providing a holistic and intergenerational approach to education, health, and wellness. Our family-centered, montessori-influenced programs follow the model of an intergenerational learning community, serving around 3,000 individuals annually with programming for pregnant moms, children, youth, parents and elders.
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth development our races youth development program provides culturally grounded, multi-faceted programming that supports latine youth in grades 6 to 12 to succeed academically, make healthy choices, strengthen their cultural identity, and engage in their community. Our be@school truancy prevention program offers family-based support to improve school attendance, while also helping parents and caregivers navigate school options and advocate for their children. This year, 100% of participants reported feeling proud of their culture and identities, and 100% shared that the program strengthened their professional development skills. In total, more than 630 individuals were impacted through our youth programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.4% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.