Centro Shalom Tijuana Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204919221
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreation& Sports N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $156,600
- Expenses
- $140,938
- Assets
- $156,600
- Liabilities
- $154,139
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Johnson (Board Chair & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Robert Johnson (Board Chair & CEO)
- Richard Thompson (Director)
- Jennie Staker (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since 1988 the vision and the mission of centro shalom tijuana has been to help the children and adolescents in the poorest neighborhoods of tijuana giving them the opportunity to escape the misery and desperation they live in and to change their lives by having a relationship with christ.
What it reported doing in 2022
Children's Ministry - ministering to approximately 500 children presenting them with the hope of the gospel. We help educate them to distance them from the life and violence they've known on the streets and we distribute free food to the families to alleviate their physical hunger.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.98; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $141K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.