Centro San Vicente
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742505561
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- El Paso, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9158597545
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,503,739
- Expenses
- $22,251,151
- Assets
- $14,587,713
- Liabilities
- $8,819,139
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINA I PAZ (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CELINA BELTRAN (CMO): $228,471 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINA I PAZ (CEO): $201,951 total reported compensation
- SYLVIA MARTINEZ (PHYSICIAN): $198,082 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide community-based primary healthcare with particular concern for the poor and needy. With a coordinated and holistic apporach in caring for body, mind, and spirit, offer affordable health care, social service, and health education programs in collaboration with other health, social service and educational agencies.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hrsa - chc and hc programs the overall goal of the hrsa health care program(s) is to make available accessible affordable primary care in a manner that is patient centric, culturally and linguistic appropriate, adheres to evidence based standards, and improves the health status of communities. The target population is the uninsured, and medically indigent. This includes serving special populations such as the immigrant communities, the homeless, those living with HIV, and members of the lgbt community. In the current year, the center served over 14,581 unduplicated patiens. Primary health care program - Texas state department of health the overall goal of the primary health care program is to offer primary care services to residents of Texas who are uninsured and are at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. In the current year, the primary health care program served 12,632 patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $47.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $228K · 21 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.3M reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.