Centro Pro Vida Independiente Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 660593906
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ponce, PR, USA
- Phone
- 7878485240
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $393,487
- Expenses
- $397,785
- Assets
- $60,902
- Liabilities
- $34,478
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDGARDO VEGA DELGADO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- EDGARDO VEGA DELGADO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $38,520 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote the independent living philosophy offering a person with disabilities more control in decision-making; that includes consumer control, development of peer relationships and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
During fiscal year 20242025 services were provided to members of the community: workshops, educational talks, and service fairs were conducted serving 119 individuals. Outreach activities were held in multiple municipalities, providing services to 196 individuals. Educational sessions included youth transition, emergency preparedness for individuals with disabilities, home safety, ada law, and more, in collaboration with partner agencies (47 activities). 8 consumers received independent living philosophy training in 4 workshops. 15 advocacy activities were conducted to promote systemic change and identify community barriers. 17 volunteers contributed to service delivery. Media outreach included 9 radio programs with participation from 26 individuals. Other services: removable parking permit: 3 / 3. Id (deaf person id, laws 107 and 51): 3 / 3. Directories: 10 / 10. Additional category: 11 / 11. Eleven (11) community members benefited from disability parking placard and one (1) person benefited from id pwd: id express line and discount in activities (id law 51, id law 107). Throughout the fiscal year, three hundred and five (305) people impacted through workshops, educational talks, as follows, services fairs were one hundred nineteen (119) individuals served, service outreach one hundred ninetysix (196), and radio interviews benefited twenty-six (26) people. On other workshop on the philosophy of independent living 4 trainings on the philosophy of independent living were provided to eight consumers. Technical assistance was provided to four community members. C.p.r. Training was offered to 32 people, including 22 community members and 10 consumers. Employees, community members, consumers, and members of the board of directors participated and benefited from this activity. System advocacy and community participation were promoted through public hearings attended by 13 people, including 11 consumers and 2 community members. 15 (fifteen) advocacy and empowerment activities were conducted with the participation of 155 individuals, including 78 consumers and 77 community members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.2%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.2% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $276K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $39K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.