Centro Del Pueblo Movimiento Indigena Migrante

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920411172
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Arcata, CA, USA
Phone
7076835293
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$877,843
Expenses
$568,661
Assets
$624,923
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jessica Dirks (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jessica Dirks (Executive Director): $60,000 total reported compensation
  • William Dirks (Treasurer/CFO): $48,000 total reported compensation
  • Sharon Cervantes (Secretary/Outreach Specialist): $14,460 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt Purpose of Centro del Pueblo Movimiento Indigena Migrante is to empower the Latinx community in Humboldt county. To provide access to resources and public services. And to create spaces of Art and culture.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our program Hermana Flor is our women's program for dealing with gendered violence, adverse experiences and showcasing the strength and importance of women in our community. . We recognized the role of women in preserving our cultural knowledge and traditions into our Sanctuary Gardens through teaching dance and embroidery. In addition, we began to revitalize our indigenous languages such as Zapoteco and Mixteco, using our culture to empower these women in their process of healing. We facilitate conversations on healing from trauma and gendered violence , empowering our elders to teach and share their experiences with the younger generation. The Hermana Flor group is about 25 women and children. The children have been learning traditional dance and embroidery from the elders. Accomplishment in 2023: We have learned a total of 2 dances traditional dances which we do performances for the community. Flor de Pina and Flor Munidita. we started a second group for dance therapy, Baile Terapia, which is a mix of Zumba and Cumbia. This one is much faster paced and used as exercise and stress relief for the community. The art and cultural aspects have been really exposed in the broader community increasing diversity here. We presented public zumba classes at local events as well as encouraged the younger members to have differing lebvels of ballet folcorico, elementray students highschool and elders.In 2025 we reduced activities of Hermana Flor however we did create the first spanish language doula program helping new mothers as we don't have accessible doctors for maternal care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34.7%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 52.8%; rating input score 53
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 53.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 46.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.7% of revenue deployed · 52.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $300K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.