Central Valley Health Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770578450
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Hanford, CA, USA
Phone
5595370760
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,446,933
Expenses
$122,628
Assets
$10,007,746
Liabilities
$5,092

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Day Lauren (President)
  • Ammon Edward (Former Fdtn President thru 1/22)

Highest reported compensation

  • Wells Jason (Board Member): $1,622,864 total reported compensation
  • Kofl Andrea thru 124 (Board Member): $1,140,021 total reported compensation
  • Haydock Timothy (Treasurer): $807,126 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Central Valley Health Foundation (CVHF) is a California not-for-profit corporation. The Foundation was organized to coordinate the solicitation of contributions through its operations and to disburse such contributions, earnings, and the income to support Adventist Health Hanford, Adventist Health Selma, Adventist Health Reedley, Adventist Health Tulare and Western Health Resources. The special fundraising events provide opportunity for interaction and involvement between community members, community leaders, Hanford Community Hospital and the Foundation.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Central Valley Health Foundation provided financial support for the Central Valley Network, which includes Adventist Health Hanford, Adventist Health Selma, Adventist Health Reedley, Adventist Health Tulare and their related clinics. In addition, support is being provided for the hospice operated by Western Health Resources (WHR) and for other humanitarian purposes.Many employees at Adventist Health in the Central Valley support the Central Valley Health Foundations Employee Emergency Fund. The Employee Emergency Fund was created to support employees during an unexpected financial hardship. Employees are asked to fill out an application which is reviewed by Human Resources and an established committee. In 2023, $26,999 was disbursed to 20 employees. Adventist Health knows that our greatest strength is our employees, and the Employee Emergency Fund is one of the many ways Adventist Health invests in the wellbeing of our people. Adventist Health in the Central Valley has three birth centers, Hanford, Tulare, and Reedley. With thousands of deliveries happening each year, not every delivery outcome is a positive one. The Healing Hearts Fund was established by employees who wanted to do something to support the mothers who experience the loss of a baby at our hospitals. The Healing Hearts fund gives mothers the opportunity to have their childs funeral expenses covered up to $1,000. The Birth Centers also provide other forms of support which helps our patients and employees during a tragic time. In 2023, financial support of $10,396 was provided to 10 receipients. Separately, let us share an experience that illustrates how we care for our community: My name is Araceli Cervantes and I am a commnity health worker in the Central Valley. On August 5th, Practice Administrator Lisa Chavarin sent me a message via Teams, sharing that Dr. Christine Millan had a patient in need of financial assistance. I didnt know much at first, but as I read through the few details I was given, something tugged at my heart. This patients story would soon become deeply meaningful to me.He had just been diagnosed with colon cancer. But rather than focus on the frightening news about his health, his first words revealed a different kind of pain he worried, How will I pay my rent? Without hesitation, I stopped what I was doing and began searching for resources throughout the community. I made calls, filled out referrals, and connected him with programs offering food boxes, transportation to medical appointments, and, most urgently, rental assistance.During my search, Social Worker Maria shared with me the contact information of Lauren Day from The Foundation and encouraged me to reach out. With hope in my heart, I emailed Lauren, explaining the patients situation and asking if there were any available funds to help cover his rent.Lauren responded almost immediately, confirming that The Foundation had funds available to assist. All she needed was a receipt showing the rent amount. I called the patient right away to share the wonderful news. His voice, filled with gratitude and emotion, made it clear that this was more than just financial help it was a lifeline. For the first time since his diagnosis, he could focus on his health and on supporting his wife, who had just received difficult news of her own: a tumor growing in her stomach.The patient quickly brought in his rent bill, and I sent it to Lauren. By the very next day, she emailed me to say the rent check was ready. I called the patient again, this time with tears in my eyes, to tell him his rent had been paid. His response was filled with heartfelt thanks he said it was as if a huge weight had been lifted from his shoulders.Later that day, when I met his wife at the Complex Care Clinic, her joy was radiant. She repeatedly thanked me and The Foundation, saying what a blessing it was to have people who cared so deeply during such a hard time. Her words stayed with me: You are a blessing, and The Founda

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.9%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 65%; rating input score 65
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7,670.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.5%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 81.61; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 304.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.9% of revenue deployed · 65% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.6M · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.