Central Valley Crisis Pregnancy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770027014
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5592370683
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,350,152
Expenses
$1,388,047
Assets
$3,016,584
Liabilities
$4,927

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TERRY JOHNSON (Vice President)
  • ALLISON MARTINEZ (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • KRISTI BURKHART (Executive Dir.): $59,719 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pregnancy counseling

What it reported doing in 2024

Central Valley Crisis Pregnancy Center (Pregnancy Care Center), is a CDPH licensed community care clinic that exists to serve families in our community experiencing unexpected pregnancies. We do this by offering free and confidential medical services, advocacy, education, referrals, and support resources. We proudly pursue our mission through the support services we offer our patients and clients. During the 2024-2025 fiscal year we provided 1,229 pregnancy tests, 495 ultrasounds, and experienced a total of 3,529 client visits through our doors. We also had 1,423 instances of class attendance thoughout the year, and distributed 28 car seats to parents who participated in our "Earn to Learn" program. Through our reproductive loss support services we served 19 individuals who experienced loss due to miscarriages, infertility, still birth, or abortion. PCC is also part of the Abortion Pill Rescue Network and through the protocol used in the abortion pill reversal process we were able to provide 4 individual patients with this service successfully. We served 112 male clients through our men's services that provide pregnancy options, coaching classes, resources, referrals and more. Our secondary Maple Clinic provides pregnancy tests, advocacy, resources, and referrals. We have these same services available on our mobile clinic, which allows us to go out and reach the greater Fresno area. Each clinic allows for us to reach more of our community with the support services and hope we offer. Pregnancy Care Center continues to offer our HOPE (Healthy Options in Prevention Education) Team as a resource to our community, where we provide relationship and sexual integrity presentations to youth and adults. We present in the group homes, juvenile justice center, schools, and youth groups thoughout Fresno County. Last fiscal year we reached over 1,115 people through these presentations.All of our services are free of charge to our clients, insurances, medi-Cal, and taxpayer funds. We are fully funded by this community for this community. Our donors are reached and engaged through our fundraising events, newsletters, director's letters, and emails.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $72.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.17; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.1% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.