Central Valley Childrens Partnership Central Valley Afterschool Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262921693
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5593262165
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$179,129
Expenses
$241,296
Assets
$20,468
Liabilities
$2,015

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RANDY MEHRTEN (President)

People named in this filing

  • LINDSAY CALLAHAN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • RICO PERALTA (BOARD MEMBER)
  • RANDY MEHRTEN (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide children and youth with exceptional opportunities to learn and grow in their out of school time. This objective is achieved by providing site-based support, training and coaching; holding learning communities; quality assessment tools, focus groups, summer time learning events; and various media communications.

What it reported doing in 2015

Technical assistance to more than 100 sites, 30 training sessions to more than 100 leaders; developed a learning community concept for the field; helped to develop qsar an assessment tool; fresno county focus groups; launched one of five summer learning programs in the state; developed events to illuminate afterschool programs in the valley; brought canstruction to the valley to help fight hunger with 25,000 pounds of food and teach students about the design build profession; illuminated afterschool through local media; gained 70 business partners; engaged in research to further stem learning, leadership, summertime learning, obesity and the arts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -34.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $219K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.