Central Texas Subcontractors Association Austin Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742431842
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cedar Park, TX, USA
Phone
5122556373
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$49,505
Expenses
$54,442
Assets
$68,022
Liabilities
$33,700

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHAWN YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
  • JIM SUNVISON (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS LAMBERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CARRIE BUCKLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SHAWN YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
  • SEWALL CUTLER (ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY)
  • PARKER HOLT (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the professional relationship between subcontractors and the construction industry and to contend with trade and promotional problems of subcontractors within the building construction industry.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide a channel for the exchange of information between subcontractors and others to present concerns and interests of its members in the construction industry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.