Central Texas Orphan Mission Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161706823
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Bryan, TX, USA
Phone
9797777978
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,410
Expenses
$79,147
Assets
$99,137

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN HALL (PRESIDENT)
  • WESLEY HALL (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KAREN HALL (PRESIDENT)
  • WESLEY HALL (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH B KEE (BOARD MBR ORPHAN EDUC)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the well-being of orphans and other needy persons domestically and abroad by providing education, medical services, humanitarian and financial aid.

What it reported doing in 2017

Expenses pertaining to program services assisting needy persons in israel ($14,014), ghana ($3,081), mexico ($0) pakistan ($22,200), uganda ($2,000)and egypt ($16,273)see sch. O for detail

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -59.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.