Central Station Volunteers Program
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991808596
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Killeen, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2546825605
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Grantmaking Foundations N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,800
- Expenses
- $450
- Assets
- $2,350
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- MARLO RINONOSVEGA (DIRECTOR)
- RENEE HAM (CO DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fueling unity, the csv program beats as the heart of compassion, sparking connections, and igniting positive change through diverse volunteering. Our mission is to unite and strengthen communities through collaboration with schools, eaders, churches, businesses, charitable organizations, hospitals, fanilies and our dedicated volunteers, forming a dynamic network for positive community impact. We use data and science to demonstrate the positive impact of volunteering on mental health and community well-being.
What it reported doing in 2024
Some of the duites we had to perform in 2024 included grant applications, marketing, public relations (school districts, community partners, business, organizations, churches, hospitals and npos), database management, administrative, meetings/training volunteers, web deign, software management and purchasing, attend enrollment events at schools and within the community,
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.1%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 83.9%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.22; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $450 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.