Central Pennsylvania Nursing Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232907754
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Lancaster, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7175444926
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Nursing Services (General)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $39
- Expenses
- $-86,684
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide long term nursing care and rehabilitate residents requiring skilled care.
What it reported doing in 2010
Nursing Home Care: Central Pennsylvania Nursing Alliance Inc. (d.b.a. Maple Farm Nursing Center) was a skilled nursing facility licensed for 119 beds and located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The facility purpose was to provide residents with necessary long term nursing care and to rehabilitate residents requiring skilled care. The nursing facility provided access for necessary long-term care for Lancaster County and surrounding areas by collaborating with local hospitals and long-term care agencies. The negative expenses reported are a result of adjustments to bad debt reserves and the clearing of the accounts receivable balance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · -$97K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 9 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
- Related organizations: 26 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.