Central Missouri Development Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020709722
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Columbia, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5738741444
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $641
- Expenses
- $20,859
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RANDY COIL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT ATKINS (DIRECTOR)
- TOM MENDENHALL (DIRECTOR)
- TIM CROCKETT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide community improvement by encouraging reasonable rules and regulations for the development of real estate in the state of Missouri, county of boone, and/or city of columbia and fair and consistent enforcement thereof, thereby providing for more economical and efficient real estate development and, therefore, more affordable housing, civic buildings, schools, offices, commercial buildings and other structures.
What it reported doing in 2022
Electronic newsletters to improve communications among members of the community. Educational membership meetings, studies and research on growth, development and associated topics, represent development in public policy issues, present workshops to educate and train.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3,154.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.