Central Missouri Building Industries Asn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431509419
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Jefferson City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5736356001
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $263,965
- Expenses
- $261,415
- Assets
- $292,189
- Liabilities
- $36,688
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA LEHMAN (Past President)
- ADAM BOESSEN (President)
- JEFF HOELSCHER (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- MATT ALLEN (Director)
- TONY OTTO (Director)
- JASON OTKE (HBA of MO Rep)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Central Missouri building industries association's mission is to associate home builders within this jurisdiction for the purpose of mutual advantage and cooperating, to collaborate with all fields related to the building industry within the association's jurisdiction for the benefit of the industry as a whole, and to assist in the accomplishment of the mutual objectives of the national association of home builders of the united states.
What it reported doing in 2025
National and state affiliation dues-a portion of the membership dues received are paid to the state and national home building organizations. The members receive industry journals and receive support and information regarding building industries issues affecting both national and state regions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.6%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 44.4%; rating input score 44
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.6% of revenue deployed · 44.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $114K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.