Central Minnesota Youth Soccer Assn

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411418639
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
St Cloud, MN, USA
Phone
3202535936
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$779,567
Expenses
$541,054
Assets
$721,022
Liabilities
$301,416

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EMILY WILLAERT (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIK FORSBERG (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CARLLIN MEIER (DIRECTOR OF COACHING): $56,513 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW GRIMSLEY (GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATI): $25,000 total reported compensation
  • EMILY WILLAERT (PRESIDENT): $24,524 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Central mn youth soccer association is a community and volunteer-driven soccer program that provides for the growth and development of players, coaches and referees. We work to promote a fun, fair, and safe environment that maximizes participation and improves players' skills while developing sportsmanship, teamwork, and self-confidence.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our director of coaching and staff of trainers offer year round training for the youth in our community and we contribute that to the growth, development and interest in our program. We hosted the Minnesota youth soccer state championship for all levels again this past summer. We also have a competitive fall league for players in the 9u-13u. This is a great program for players who aren't old enough to play on their high school teams. We have increased our financial assistance program with our travel program by giving tiers of aid to players in order to give more aid to more players. The cmysa recreational soccer program is an all inclusive program that aims to help players learn the game of soccer and to provide an atmosphere focused on fun and participation that will foster a love of the game of soccer and physical activity. The recreation program serves approximately 500 children, ages 5-18 in st. Cloud and the surrounding cities. We also offer fall teams and winter indoor training for the recreational players.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 56
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.6%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.6%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.6% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 18 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $496K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $57K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.