Central La Education & Youth Development Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201929398
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Pineville, LA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Golf

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,186
Assets
$963

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BUDDY STROUD (Vice President)
  • ANDREA MATTISON (President)

People named in this filing

  • SHAINA GOUDEAU (BOARD MEMBER)
  • BUDDY STROUD (Vice President)
  • KAREN BUSKIE (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the opportunities available to youth in the Central Louisiana Area by creating facilities and programs making golf more accessible to people of all diversities and social strata; particularly young people in the area who otherwise may not have an opportunity to learn and play the game.

What it reported doing in 2022

To enhance the opportunities available to youth in the Central Louisiana Area by creating facilities and programs making golf more accessible to people of all diversities and social strata; particularly young people in the area who otherwise may not have an opportunity to learn and play the game. In addition the program is designed to teach and enhance the life skills of the participants including honesty, courtesy and competition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -87.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -70.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.