Central Florida Clinical Practice Organization Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611566097
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4072661000
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,699,445
Expenses
$11,851,204
Assets
$53,059,147
Liabilities
$31,976,825

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBORAH C GERMAN MD (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALEXANDER CARTWRIGHT (DIRECTOR): $1,327,633 total reported compensation
  • DEBORAH C GERMAN MD (CEO): $930,511 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL JOHNSON PHD (FORMER DIRECTOR): $568,576 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and further the charitable activities of the university of central Florida by promoting and supporting medical education, research and patient care.

What it reported doing in 2024

Central Florida clinical practice organization, inc. (cfcpo) was created to assist the university of central Florida college of medicine in carrying out its charitable and educational activities. Cfcpo supports the business operations of the university's college of medicine clinical mission. Cfcpo collects, receives and administers the clinically related revenues and distributes that revenue in accordance with the college of medicine faculty practice plan adopted pursuant to Florida board of governors regulation 9.017 (faculty practice plan) and university of central Florida regulation 10.001. Cfcpo funds are applied and disbursed to cover operating expenses of the college of medicine clinical mission and support the mission and objectives of the university of central Florida college of medicine. Cfcpo's activities are an integral part of the university of central Florida's exempt activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 72% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 51
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.7%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 79.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.48; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $909K reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.