Central Fairfax Services Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273235569
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Springfield, VA, USA
Phone
7033540900
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fairs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$113,811
Expenses
$4,728
Assets
$109,083

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The cfs foundation is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that was established in 2010 to raise money and support community education and outreach on behalf of people with disabilities. The cfs foundation's mission is to support the expansion of vital expressive therapies and increase adaptive equipment and rehabilitation engineering offerings for adults with intellectual and physical disabilities in northern Virginia. The foundation also encourages community education efforts through special programs and events.

What it reported doing in 2010

The cfs foundation makes contributions that help servicesource's participants at the central fairfax services, inc. (cfs) dba as servicesource Virginia regional office for habilitation services-central fairfax live full, active and healthy lives. The foundation provides funding to support un-funded or under-funded programs of this office. In fy11, the foundation raised funds to support several programs, including art, dance, music and horseback riding therapies. More than 200 individuals with disabilities receive habilitation services at cfs. The cfs foundation supports programs and people served by the servicesource Virginia regional office for habilitation services, which is one of five not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organizations governed by a common member volunteer board of directors. The five regional offices remain separate legal entities but are commonly branded as "servicesource."

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 6%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 95.8%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.07; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.