Central Community Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954441566
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2134833035
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Care & Adult Day Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $174,293
- Expenses
- $208,831
- Assets
- $1,796,326
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SONG XUAN DAI (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SONG XUAN DAI (CEO): $57,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization ccsi provided social welfare services, including language interpretation, social welfare information update service, medical benefit orientation and food distribution to seniors, and low-income groups during the tax year 2025.
What it reported doing in 2025
CENTRAL COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC., DURING THE TAX YEAR 2025, PROVIDED SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION, WELFARE INFORMATION UPDATE SERVICE, MEDICAL BENEFIT ORIENTATION, MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, AND FOOD DISTRIBUTION TO SENIORS AND LOW-INCOME GROUPS OF THE LOCAL COMMUNITY. CCSI HAS HELPED ABOUT 255 PEOPLE UPDATE THEIR WELFARE BENEFITS INFORMATION FOR LAMTA TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS (LIFE PROGRAM) AND HELPED 100 LOW-INCOME GET BUS TAPE AND RENEW ACCESS TRANSPORTATION SERVICE. CCSI MAINTAINED 1 TEFAP DISTRIBUTION SITE AT LOS ANGELES VALUED AT $49,930 USDA TEFAP FOOD FROM LA FOOD BAND AND PACKED 1910 FOOD BAGS WEIGHTING 27,814 LBS TO HELP 3,656 TOTAL FAMILY MEMBERS CCSI has received for a total value of $13,109 Taxi Coupons and Taxi Vouchers from MTA partner agency, which was in turn given to the low-income seniors for their medical transportation needs. This program gives away 85 Taxi coupons to help 255 low-income seniors for their food, job, and medical transportation usage. CCSI has attracted (4 mx3dx2px3h72hrx17.5$1260.00 in-kind voluntary services into the program. CCSI has supported five local religion organizations by providing low rent to them, helping them combating their financial hardship.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 59
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.6; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $176K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.