Central Community College Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 470728813
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hastings, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4024602152
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community or Junior Colleges
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,518,927
- Expenses
- $7,263,497
- Assets
- $25,744,589
- Liabilities
- $870,951
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAY TROFHOLZ (PRESIDENT)
- BETH BOESCH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TRACI SKALBERG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TRACI SKALBERG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $120,801 total reported compensation
- SHARON LISKE (TREASURER/FINANCIAL CONTRO): $61,190 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation's mission is to advance opportunities for quality educational services in Nebraska-based institutions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program and activity support - $5,019,917 was transferred to central community college for grants. $75,500 was transferred to various other Nebraska community colleges for program support during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025. In addition, $25,172 of donated equipment and supplies were transferred to central community college to assist in various program activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.2%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.54; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.2% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.