Central Coast Overdose Prevention

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933195468
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Monterey, CA, USA
Phone
8316825008
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$662,593
Expenses
$490,112
Assets
$229,723
Liabilities
$55,274

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Reb Close MD (President)
  • Casey Grover MD (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Khanh Whited Nguyen (Secretary): $37,655 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

CCODP aims to eliminate overdoses and other negative substance-related outcomes in the Tri-County communities and beyond by increasing awareness, reducing stigma, educating the public, improving access to community support services and treatment options, exploring previously underutilized solutions, and treating substance use-related conditions with compassion.In order to ensure the above, CCODP provides spaces where community members trauma is witnessed compassionately as well as a collective space that fosters acceptance, develops healthy life skills, and meets our most basic need: true human connection.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing data collection, analysis, and reporting on: in-field treatment induction for opioid use disorder, patient connections to follow-up services, local overdose mortalities and distribution of overdose-reversing medication.Producing toolkits and publications for community partners wishing to: distribute overdose-reversing medication, educate youth, caregivers, educators, and other community members on substance use, harm reduction, and available resources, and start substance-related conversations between loved ones.Hosting community presentations and a regional Fentanyl and Overdose Prevention Summit on opioids and other substances, medication and treatment, harm reduction, and resources.Coordinating quality improvement reviews and other administrative meetings for a collaborative of EMS and hospital partners that connects patients to treatment and other services.Incentivize people with substance use disorders to begin or stay in recovery and develop habits to be physically healthy.Support families who have a loved one struggling with substance use disorder and honor families who have lost a loved one to substance use disorder and/or fentanyl poisoning by creating a memorial and/or mural.Distributing overdose-reversing medication as well as other harm reduction items (e.g., drug test strips, first aid kits, HIV test kits) through traditional avenues (e.g., drive-throughs, pop-ups, presentations, and community events) as well as non-traditional ones (e.g., stocking medication in defibrillator cabinets, buses and bus shelters, and 24-hour businesses).Creating and maintaining a website portal of resources (e.g., protocol flowcharts for medication-assisted treatment induction, a treatment program directory, infographics on emerging substances) for EMS and hospital partners as well as community members

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.1%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 196.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 180.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.1% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 6 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $431K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.