Centerstone Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261186476
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6154636610
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,877,562
- Expenses
- $5,557,500
- Assets
- $23,340,424
- Liabilities
- $218,599
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAMONA RHODES (FOUNDATION PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE SPEARS (REGIONAL FINANCE OFFICER): $226,448 total reported compensation
- RAMONA RHODES (FOUNDATION PRESIDENT): $158,260 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to "deliver care that changes people's lives"
What it reported doing in 2024
Established in 1992 (originally as the dede wallace foundation), centerstone's foundation exists to generate philanthropic support for centerstone, in support of our mission to "deliver care that changes people's lives." the foundation is accountable to our regional and national compnaies in stewarding, administering and growing philanthropic funding. The foundation is also charged with providing effective stewardship of donors and their giving intentions, as well as growing the organization's planned gifts and endowment. This work is accomplished under the guidance and purview of centerstone's foundation board of directors, which includes leadership members from all centerstone beneficiary organizations, to represent those we serve. The foundation raises philanthropic support through annual, capital and special giving campaigns, and through planning and hosting annual fundraising events in our regional markets. In addition, the foundation applies for and secures private and corporate funding in support of services, clinical innovation and patient care. The funding generated via the foundation's efforts may be reported on the financial statements and form 990s of other centerstone beneficiary organizations, rather than directly on the foundation's financial statements and form 990s. For the year ending june 30, 2025, centerstone's foundation secured more than $5 million in support of our mission's priorities across our system.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 82.8%; rating input score 83; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.2; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.1% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $226K · 14 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.