Center4specialneeds Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
275399175
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Santa Rosa Valley, CA, USA
Phone
8053381378
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$7,020
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GINA MARIE PETERS (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • GINA MARIE PETERS (President & CEO)
  • NEIL PALACHE (Secretary)
  • GREG GUTFLEISH (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide on-site therapeutic services and programs for individuals with special needs and their families.prvide financial support for families with developmental disabilities to access a variety of services and interventaions.offer monthly momsx and dads' night out and mons' coffee break events to all special need parents, regardless of age or disability.enable networking opportunities through e-mail to foster connections among special needs families.provide a comprehensive website to quickly and easily bring much needed resources to families.increase awareness and understanding within the general population through advocacy and community partnerships.continuing support of our southern California expansion.

What it reported doing in 2021

Provide resource information to special needs families regarding available health professionals, therapies and programs, and monetary resources for families to access treatment for their special needs children who do not have adequate insurance coverage or qualify for regional center services or support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 54.7%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -42% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -45.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.