Center of Creative Arts
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431395056
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147251834
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,260,450
- Expenses
- $8,646,303
- Assets
- $16,104,983
- Liabilities
- $10,241,612
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTIN JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- INDIGO SAMS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- INDIGO SAMS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $246,648 total reported compensation
- DARON HENDRIX (SR. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $127,587 total reported compensation
- SHAWNA FLANIGAN (SR. DIR. OF ARTISTIC STRATEGY): $126,014 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Enriching lives and building community through the arts.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule ococa presents - cocapresents, the signature performance season, brings thought-provoking programming for multigenerational audiences to the st. Louis community with a selection of traditional audience favorites and innovative new work from local, national, and student artists. Coca's innovative performances transform the way we think about the world around us. Coca's millstone gallery presents timely, relevant exhibitions from emerging and established artists. Exhibitions welcome visitors to examine the artistic process and engage in meaningful dialogue. With access as a core value, coca presents provides opportunities for families to experience engaging art forms and strives to make them accessible to the widest possible demographic through discounted tickets, school time performances for school students. The millstone gallery is free and open to the public. During the fiscal year 8,218 people attended these performances.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 64.9%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -38.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.9% of revenue deployed · 64.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 35 of 35 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $5.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $247K · 41 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.