Center for Values in International Development

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851972137
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Human Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,940
Expenses
$35,741
Assets
$31,691
Liabilities
$15,591

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Chloe Schwenke (President and Chair of the Board)
  • Anna Malavisi (Vice President volunteer)

People named in this filing

  • Chloe Schwenke (President and Chair of the Board)
  • Troy Caruana (Director of Programs)
  • Anna Malavisi (Vice President volunteer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To raise awareness of moral and ethical concerns that arise in international relief and development planning projects and evaluations and to advise international development and humanitarian response decision-makers on ethically desirable means and ends so that human dignity will be recognized and respected.

What it reported doing in 2022

As consultants provided moral values mapping services to identify and prioritize the core moral values and ethical principles that defined the operations planning and advocacy of a major religious nonprofit: ethics baseline phase one active on peacebuilding projects in 19 developing countries

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.1%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 57.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.