Center for Transformational Practice - Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462839524
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
Location
White River Junction, VT, USA
Phone
8027383802
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,194
Expenses
$61,078
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • REV JONATHAN BLISS (CHAIR)
  • CLEO KEARNS (VICE CHAIR)
  • MAUREEN BURFORD (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Transformational practice, inc. Is organized exclusively for charitable, educational and religiouspurposes. The purpose of this corporation is to increase regional resilience and decrease regionaldependency on fossil fuels through modeling and teaching techniques of sustainable living, modeling and teaching collective practices for strengthening local communities organizations and movements, and maintaining a center for spiritual practice based on living in balance with nature.

What it reported doing in 2022

Ctp carried out the emergency shelter project, which built, installed and supported 4 mobile shelter units for 4 people experiencing homelessness, and build, installed and supported 3 non mobile units for people experiencing homelessness. In 2022, this project supported over 1600 night stays, built community and empowered residents through engaging all residents in the process of construction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.3%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 42.9%; rating input score 43

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -43% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -58.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -105% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.3% of revenue deployed · 42.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.