Center for the Research and Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953665207
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3102087330
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,092
Expenses
$2,056
Assets
$3,598
Liabilities
$36,628

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACQUELINE GRAYSON (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • BURT CRAUSMAN (CFO)
  • JACQUELINE GRAYSON (President & CEO)
  • JAY SCHAPIRA (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See statement attached

What it reported doing in 2020

The center provides psychotherapy and family counseling for patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia, most of whom are financially unable to pay for treatment. A support group program is also maintained to prevent recurrence, once the eating problem is resolved. The modality most used with these patients are cognitive therapy, behavioral therapy, supportive therapy, and at times hypnotherapy. The center has been temporarily closed since covid-19. Therefore there hasn't been a working staff nor have patients been seen.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -88.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 10.18; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.